Demystifying Design Choices of Reinforcement Fine-tuning: A Batched Contextual Bandit Learning Perspective
This work addresses a foundational issue for researchers in reinforcement fine-tuning, providing clarity on design choices to guide future work, though it is incremental in nature.
The paper tackled the problem of understanding the role and importance of various design choices in reinforcement fine-tuning by constructing a minimalist baseline and analyzing marginal gains of factors like advantage and number of rollouts, revealing new insights and identifying critical choices.
The reinforcement fine-tuning area is undergoing an explosion papers largely on optimizing design choices. Though performance gains are often claimed, inconsistent conclusions also arise from time to time, making the progress illusive. Reflecting on this illusion, we still lack principled answers to two fundamental questions: 1) what is the role of each design choice? 2) which ones are critical? This paper aims to shed light on them. The underlying challenge is that design choices are entangled together, making their contribution to learning and generalization difficult to attribute. To address this challenge, we first construct a minimalist baseline for disentangling factors: one rollout per query in each round, the outcome reward serving as the training signal without any advantage trick, and a batch size of thirty-two. This baseline connects to batched contextual bandit learning, which facilitates experimental analysis. Centering around this baseline, we design an experiment pipeline, examining the marginal gains of factors like advantage, number of rollouts, etc. Experiments on three base models and two datasets, not only reveal new understanding on the role of various design choices on learning and generalization dynamics, but also identify critical ones that deserve more effort.