LGJan 30

Dispersion Loss Counteracts Embedding Condensation and Improves Generalization in Small Language Models

arXiv:2602.00217v1h-index: 12
Originality Highly original
AI Analysis

This work addresses a geometric representational issue in small language models to improve their generalization without adding parameters, offering a principled path for enhancing smaller Transformers.

The paper tackles the problem of embedding condensation in small language models, where token embeddings collapse into a narrow subspace, by introducing a dispersion loss that encourages embedding dispersion during training, resulting in performance gains across 10 benchmarks.

Large language models (LLMs) achieve remarkable performance through ever-increasing parameter counts, but scaling incurs steep computational costs. To better understand LLM scaling, we study representational differences between LLMs and their smaller counterparts, with the goal of replicating the representational qualities of larger models in the smaller models. We observe a geometric phenomenon which we term $\textbf{embedding condensation}$, where token embeddings collapse into a narrow cone-like subspace in some language models. Through systematic analyses across multiple Transformer families, we show that small models such as $\texttt{GPT2}$ and $\texttt{Qwen3-0.6B}$ exhibit severe condensation, whereas the larger models such as $\texttt{GPT2-xl}$ and $\texttt{Qwen3-32B}$ are more resistant to this phenomenon. Additional observations show that embedding condensation is not reliably mitigated by knowledge distillation from larger models. To fight against it, we formulate a dispersion loss that explicitly encourages embedding dispersion during training. Experiments demonstrate that it mitigates condensation, recovers dispersion patterns seen in larger models, and yields performance gains across 10 benchmarks. We believe this work offers a principled path toward improving smaller Transformers without additional parameters.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes