Scientific Theory of a Black-Box: A Life Cycle-Scale XAI Framework Based on Constructive Empiricism
This addresses the problem of inconsistent and isolated explanations in XAI for stakeholders, though it appears incremental as it builds on existing XAI methods with a new framework.
The authors tackled the lack of a principled way to consolidate explanatory information about black-box AI models into a persistent, auditable artefact throughout their life cycle by introducing a scientific theory of a black-box (SToBB) framework, resulting in a proof-of-concept instantiation with a neural-network classifier and the CoBoT algorithm for maintaining rule-based surrogates.
Explainable AI (XAI) offers a growing number of algorithms that aim to answer specific questions about black-box models. What is missing is a principled way to consolidate explanatory information about a fixed black-box model into a persistent, auditable artefact, that accompanies the black-box throughout its life cycle. We address this gap by introducing the notion of a scientific theory of a black (SToBB). Grounded in Constructive Empiricism, a SToBB fulfils three obligations: (i) empirical adequacy with respect to all available observations of black-box behaviour, (ii) adaptability via explicit update commitments that restore adequacy when new observations arrive, and (iii) auditability through transparent documentation of assumptions, construction choices, and update behaviour. We operationalise these obligations as a general framework that specifies an extensible observation base, a traceable hypothesis class, algorithmic components for construction and revision, and documentation sufficient for third-party assessment. Explanations for concrete stakeholder needs are then obtained by querying the maintained record through interfaces, rather than by producing isolated method outputs. As a proof of concept, we instantiate a complete SToBB for a neural-network classifier on a tabular task and introduce the Constructive Box Theoriser (CoBoT) algorithm, an online procedure that constructs and maintains an empirically adequate rule-based surrogate as observations accumulate. Together, these contributions position SToBBs as a life cycle-scale, inspectable point of reference that supports consistent, reusable analyses and systematic external scrutiny.