CLAIIRFeb 9

GISA: A Benchmark for General Information-Seeking Assistant

arXiv:2602.08543v12 citationsh-index: 40
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This addresses the need for more realistic and comprehensive benchmarks for general information-seeking assistants, though it is incremental as it builds on existing evaluation frameworks.

The authors tackled the problem of evaluating search agents by introducing GISA, a benchmark with 373 human-crafted queries that reflect real-world information-seeking scenarios, and found that even the best-performing model achieved only a 19.30% exact match score.

The advancement of large language models (LLMs) has significantly accelerated the development of search agents capable of autonomously gathering information through multi-turn web interactions. Various benchmarks have been proposed to evaluate such agents. However, existing benchmarks often construct queries backward from answers, producing unnatural tasks misaligned with real-world needs. Moreover, these benchmarks tend to focus on either locating specific information or aggregating information from multiple sources, while relying on static answer sets prone to data contamination. To bridge these gaps, we introduce GISA, a benchmark for General Information-Seeking Assistants comprising 373 human-crafted queries that reflect authentic information-seeking scenarios. GISA features four structured answer formats (item, set, list, and table), enabling deterministic evaluation. It integrates both deep reasoning and broad information aggregation within unified tasks, and includes a live subset with periodically updated answers to resist memorization. Notably, GISA provides complete human search trajectories for every query, offering gold-standard references for process-level supervision and imitation learning. Experiments on mainstream LLMs and commercial search products reveal that even the best-performing model achieves only 19.30\% exact match score, with performance notably degrading on tasks requiring complex planning and comprehensive information gathering. These findings highlight substantial room for future improvement.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes