CRAICLFeb 10

Omni-Safety under Cross-Modality Conflict: Vulnerabilities, Dynamics Mechanisms and Efficient Alignment

arXiv:2602.10161v1Has Code
Originality Highly original
AI Analysis

This addresses safety risks in multimodal AI systems, offering an efficient alignment method to enhance robustness against harmful inputs, though it is incremental as it builds on existing safety frameworks.

The paper tackles cross-modal safety vulnerabilities in Omni-modal Large Language Models (OLLMs) by analyzing mechanisms like Mid-layer Dissolution and proposing OmniSteer, which increases the Refusal Success Rate against harmful inputs from 69.9% to 91.2% while preserving general capabilities.

Omni-modal Large Language Models (OLLMs) greatly expand LLMs' multimodal capabilities but also introduce cross-modal safety risks. However, a systematic understanding of vulnerabilities in omni-modal interactions remains lacking. To bridge this gap, we establish a modality-semantics decoupling principle and construct the AdvBench-Omni dataset, which reveals a significant vulnerability in OLLMs. Mechanistic analysis uncovers a Mid-layer Dissolution phenomenon driven by refusal vector magnitude shrinkage, alongside the existence of a modal-invariant pure refusal direction. Inspired by these insights, we extract a golden refusal vector using Singular Value Decomposition and propose OmniSteer, which utilizes lightweight adapters to modulate intervention intensity adaptively. Extensive experiments show that our method not only increases the Refusal Success Rate against harmful inputs from 69.9% to 91.2%, but also effectively preserves the general capabilities across all modalities. Our code is available at: https://github.com/zhrli324/omni-safety-research.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes