CLAIFeb 17

Far Out: Evaluating Language Models on Slang in Australian and Indian English

arXiv:2602.15373v2
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses a critical issue for users of non-standard English varieties by highlighting systematic asymmetries in model performance, though it is incremental as it builds on existing evaluation frameworks for language variety gaps.

The paper tackled the problem of language models' performance gaps in understanding slang in non-standard English varieties, specifically Indian and Australian English, by evaluating seven state-of-the-art models on tasks like target word prediction and selection, finding that discriminative tasks outperformed generative ones with accuracy scores ranging from 0.03 to 0.54.

Language models exhibit systematic performance gaps when processing text in non-standard language varieties, yet their ability to comprehend variety-specific slang remains underexplored for several languages. We present a comprehensive evaluation of slang awareness in Indian English (en-IN) and Australian English (en-AU) across seven state-of-the-art language models. We construct two complementary datasets: WEB, containing 377 web-sourced usage examples from Urban Dictionary, and GEN, featuring 1,492 synthetically generated usages of these slang terms, across diverse scenarios. We assess language models on three tasks: target word prediction (TWP), guided target word prediction (TWP$^*$) and target word selection (TWS). Our results reveal four key findings: (1) Higher average model performance TWS versus TWP and TWP$^*$, with average accuracy score increasing from 0.03 to 0.49 respectively (2) Stronger average model performance on WEB versus GEN datasets, with average similarity score increasing by 0.03 and 0.05 across TWP and TWP$^*$ tasks respectively (3) en-IN tasks outperform en-AU when averaged across all models and datasets, with TWS demonstrating the largest disparity, increasing average accuracy from 0.44 to 0.54. These findings underscore fundamental asymmetries between generative and discriminative competencies for variety-specific language, particularly in the context of slang expressions despite being in a technologically rich language such as English.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes