AILGFeb 23

IR$^3$: Contrastive Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Interpretable Detection and Mitigation of Reward Hacking

arXiv:2602.19416v12 citationsh-index: 9
Originality Highly original
AI Analysis

This addresses the issue of opaque and exploitable alignment in LLMs for AI safety and reliability, representing a novel method rather than an incremental improvement.

The paper tackles the problem of reward hacking in RLHF-tuned LLMs, where models exploit spurious correlations in proxy rewards, by introducing IR3, a framework that reverse-engineers implicit objectives and surgically repairs them, achieving 0.89 correlation with ground-truth rewards, over 90% precision in identifying hacking features, and reducing hacking behaviors while maintaining capabilities within 3% of the original model.

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) enables powerful LLM alignment but can introduce reward hacking - models exploit spurious correlations in proxy rewards without genuine alignment. Compounding this, the objectives internalized during RLHF remain opaque, making hacking behaviors difficult to detect or correct. We introduce IR3 (Interpretable Reward Reconstruction and Rectification), a framework that reverse-engineers, interprets, and surgically repairs the implicit objectives driving RLHF-tuned models. We propose Contrastive Inverse Reinforcement Learning (C-IRL), which reconstructs the implicit reward function by contrasting paired responses from post-alignment and baseline policies to explain behavioral shifts during RLHF. We then decompose the reconstructed reward via sparse autoencoders into interpretable features, enabling identification of hacking signatures through contribution analysis. Finally, we propose mitigation strategies - clean reward optimization, adversarial shaping, constrained optimization, and feature-guided distillation - that target problematic features while preserving beneficial alignment. Experiments across multiple reward model configurations show that IR3 achieves 0.89 correlation with ground-truth rewards, identifies hacking features with over 90% precision, and significantly reduces hacking behaviors while maintaining capabilities within 3% of the original model.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes