PLAIFeb 22

Analyzing Latency Hiding and Parallelism in an MLIR-based AI Kernel Compiler

arXiv:2602.20204v1
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses performance optimization for AI kernels on edge devices, presenting an incremental analysis of compiler mechanisms.

The paper tackled the problem of optimizing AI kernel compilation for edge devices by analyzing the contributions of vectorization, multi-threading, and double buffering in an MLIR-based compiler, finding that vectorization provides primary gains for bandwidth-sensitive kernels, multi-threading improves performance with amortized overhead, and double buffering benefits when transfers and compute overlap.

AI kernel compilation for edge devices depends on the compiler's ability to exploit parallelism and hide memory latency in the presence of hierarchical memory and explicit data movement. This paper reports a benchmark methodology and corresponding results for three compiler-controlled mechanisms in an MLIR-based compilation pipeline: vectorization (Vec), multi-threading (MT) across hardware contexts, and double buffering (DB) using ping--pong scratchpad buffers to overlap DMA transfers with compute. Using Triton/Inductor-generated kernels, we present an ablation ladder that separates the contribution of Vec, MT, and DB, and we quantify how MT speedup scales with problem size using GELU as a representative activation kernel. The results show that vectorization provides the primary gain for bandwidth-sensitive kernels, MT delivers substantial improvements once scheduling overhead is amortized, and DB provides additional benefit when transfers and compute can be overlapped (i.e., outside the extremes of purely memory-bound or purely compute-bound behavior).

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes