LGMar 3

Less Noise, Same Certificate: Retain Sensitivity for Unlearning

arXiv:2603.03172v1h-index: 4
Originality Highly original
AI Analysis

This work addresses the problem of efficient certified machine unlearning for data owners and users who need to remove the influence of certain data points from trained models.

This paper tackles the problem of certified machine unlearning by introducing retain sensitivity, which allows for the same certificates with less noise, resulting in a reduction in noise across several problems. The approach is validated theoretically and empirically, showing improvements in utility.

Certified machine unlearning aims to provably remove the influence of a deletion set $U$ from a model trained on a dataset $S$, by producing an unlearned output that is statistically indistinguishable from retraining on the retain set $R:=S\setminus U$. Many existing certified unlearning methods adapt techniques from Differential Privacy (DP) and add noise calibrated to global sensitivity, i.e., the worst-case output change over all adjacent datasets. We show that this DP-style calibration is often overly conservative for unlearning, based on a key observation: certified unlearning, by definition, does not require protecting the privacy of the retained data $R$. Motivated by this distinction, we define retain sensitivity as the worst-case output change over deletions $U$ while keeping $R$ fixed. While insufficient for DP, retain sensitivity is exactly sufficient for unlearning, allowing for the same certificates with less noise. We validate these reductions in noise theoretically and empirically across several problems, including the weight of minimum spanning trees, PCA, and ERM. Finally, we refine the analysis of two widely used certified unlearning algorithms through the lens of retain sensitivity, leveraging the regularity induced by $R$ to further reduce noise and improve utility.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes