How Professional Visual Artists are Negotiating Generative AI in the Workplace
This study addresses the impact of generative AI on the careers and workplaces of professional visual artists, highlighting their strong opposition and negative experiences.
This paper surveyed 378 professional visual artists to understand the impact of generative AI on their careers and workplaces. It found that most artists strongly oppose using generative AI and employ refusal strategies, while also reporting overwhelmingly negative impacts such as increased stress and reduced job opportunities.
Generative AI has been heavily critiqued by artists in both popular media and HCI scholarship. However, more work is needed to understand the impacts of generative AI on professional artists' workplaces and careers. In this paper, we conduct a survey of \textit{378 verified professional visual artists} about how generative AI has impacted their careers and workplaces. We find (1) most visual artists are strongly opposed to using generative AI (text or visual) and negotiate their inclusion in the workplace through a variety of \textit{refusal} strategies (2) there exist a range of factors in artists environments shaping their use of generative AI, including pressure from clients, bosses, and peers and (3) visual artists report overwhelmingly negative impacts of generative AI on their workplaces, leading to added stress and reduced job opportunities. In light of these findings, we encourage HCI researchers to contend more deeply with artists' desires not to use generative AI in the workplace.