AILGMar 8

COOL-MC: Verifying and Explaining RL Policies for Multi-bridge Network Maintenance

arXiv:2603.07546v1
Predicted impact top 84% in AI · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses the critical need for verifiable and interpretable maintenance strategies for aging bridge networks, providing infrastructure managers with formal safety guarantees and insights into RL policy behavior.

This paper introduces COOL-MC, a tool for verifying and explaining reinforcement learning policies for multi-bridge network maintenance. It was applied to a three-bridge network, revealing a safety-violation probability of 3.5% for the trained RL policy and a systematic bias towards one bridge.

Aging bridge networks require proactive, verifiable, and interpretable maintenance strategies, yet reinforcement learning (RL) policies trained solely on reward signals provide no formal safety guarantees and remain opaque to infrastructure managers. We demonstrate COOL-MC as a tool for verifying and explaining RL policies for multi-bridge network maintenance, building on a single-bridge Markov decision process (MDP) from the literature and extending it to a parallel network of three heterogeneous bridges with a shared periodic budget constraint, encoded in the PRISM modeling language. We train an RL agent on this MDP and apply probabilistic model checking and explainability methods to the induced discrete-time Markov chain (DTMC) that arises from the interaction between the learned policy and the underlying MDP. Probabilistic model checking reveals that the trained policy has a safety-violation probability of 3.5\% over the planning horizon, being slightly above the theoretical minimum of 0\% and indicating the suboptimality of the learned policy, noting that these results are based on artificially constructed transition probabilities and deterioration rates rather than real-world data, so absolute performance figures should be interpreted with caution. The explainability analysis further reveals, for instance, a systematic bias in the trained policy toward the state of bridge 1 over the remaining bridges in the network. These results demonstrate COOL-MC's ability to provide formal, interpretable, and practical analysis of RL maintenance policies.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes