Formalizing the stability of the two Higgs doublet model potential into Lean: identifying an error in the literature

arXiv:2603.08139v166.85 citations
Predicted impact top 53% in HEP-PH · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work is significant for the high-energy physics community, as it corrects a widely cited result regarding the stability conditions of the 2HDM potential.

This paper re-examined the stability of the two Higgs doublet model (2HDM) potential, originally studied by Maniatis et al. in 2006. Through formalization using interactive theorem provers, the authors identified an error in the original paper's arguments, invalidating its main theorem on 2HDM potential stability.

In 2006, using the best methods and techniques available at the time, Maniatis, von Manteuffel, Nachtmann and Nagel published a now widely cited paper on the stability of the two Higgs doublet model (2HDM) potential. Twenty years on, it is now easier to apply the process of formalization into an interactive theorem prover to this work thanks to projects like Mathlib and PhysLib (formerly PhysLean and Lean-QuantumInfo), and to ask for a higher standard of mathematical correctness. Doing so has revealed an error in the arguments of this 2006 paper, invalidating their main theorem on the stability of the 2HDM potential. This case is noteworthy because to the best of our knowledge it is the first non-trivial error in a physics paper found through formalization. It was one of the first papers where formalization was attempted, which raises the uncomfortable question of how many physics papers would not pass this higher level of scrutiny.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes