MAAIMar 10

Emotional Modulation in Swarm Decision Dynamics

arXiv:2603.09963v18.7
Predicted impact top 68% in MA · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses the problem of understanding emotional effects on group decisions for researchers in swarm intelligence and affective modeling, though it is incremental as it builds on existing bee equation theory.

The study tackled how emotional factors like valence and arousal influence collective decision-making in swarms by extending the bee equation into an agent-based model, showing that emotional modulation can bias outcomes and alter convergence times through shifts in recruitment and inhibition rates.

Collective decision-making in biological and human groups often emerges from simple interaction rules that amplify minor differences into consensus. The bee equation, developed initially to describe nest-site selection in honeybee swarms, captures this dynamic through recruitment and inhibition processes. Here, we extend the bee equation into an agent-based model in which emotional valence (positive-negative) and arousal (low-high) act as modulators of interaction rates, effectively altering the recruitment and cross-inhibition parameters. Agents display simulated facial expressions mapped from their valence-arousal states, allowing the study of emotional contagion in consensus formation. Three scenarios are explored: (1) the joint effect of valence and arousal on consensus outcomes and speed, (2) the role of arousal in breaking ties when valence is matched, and (3) the "snowball effect" in which consensus accelerates after surpassing intermediate support thresholds. Results show that emotional modulation can bias decision outcomes and alter convergence times by shifting effective recruitment and inhibition rates. At the same time, intrinsic non-linear amplification can produce decisive wins even in fully symmetric emotional conditions. These findings link classical swarm decision theory with affective and social modelling, highlighting how both emotional asymmetries and structural tipping points shape collective outcomes. The proposed framework offers a flexible tool for studying the emotional dimensions of collective choice in both natural and artificial systems.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes