CreativeBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Machine Creativity via Self-Evolving Challenges
This work addresses the problem of evaluating machine creativity for researchers in AI and code generation, though it is incremental as it builds on existing cognitive frameworks and evolutionary systems.
The paper tackles the lack of quantitative evaluation for machine creativity in code generation by introducing CreativeBench, a benchmark that objectively measures creativity as the product of quality and novelty, revealing that scaling improves combinatorial creativity but yields diminishing returns for exploration.
The saturation of high-quality pre-training data has shifted research focus toward evolutionary systems capable of continuously generating novel artifacts, leading to the success of AlphaEvolve. However, the progress of such systems is hindered by the lack of rigorous, quantitative evaluation. To tackle this challenge, we introduce CreativeBench, a benchmark for evaluating machine creativity in code generation, grounded in a classical cognitive framework. Comprising two subsets -- CreativeBench-Combo and CreativeBench-Explore -- the benchmark targets combinatorial and exploratory creativity through an automated pipeline utilizing reverse engineering and self-play. By leveraging executable code, CreativeBench objectively distinguishes creativity from hallucination via a unified metric defined as the product of quality and novelty. Our analysis of state-of-the-art models reveals distinct behaviors: (1) scaling significantly improves combinatorial creativity but yields diminishing returns for exploration; (2) larger models exhibit ``convergence-by-scaling,'' becoming more correct but less divergent; and (3) reasoning capabilities primarily benefit constrained exploration rather than combination. Finally, we propose EvoRePE, a plug-and-play inference-time steering strategy that internalizes evolutionary search patterns to consistently enhance machine creativity.