Deep Learning-Based Metamodeling of Nonlinear Stochastic Dynamic Systems under Parametric and Predictive Uncertainty
This work addresses a critical problem in structural engineering by enabling more efficient uncertainty quantification in high-dimensional systems, though it is incremental as it builds on existing neural network methods.
The paper tackled the computational challenge of modeling nonlinear stochastic dynamic systems under both parametric and predictive uncertainty by developing three deep learning metamodeling frameworks, which achieved low prediction errors and demonstrated a correlation between predictive variance and actual error for structural response predictions.
Modeling high-dimensional, nonlinear dynamic structural systems under natural hazards presents formidable computational challenges, especially when simultaneously accounting for uncertainties in external loads and structural parameters. Studies have successfully incorporated uncertainties related to external loads from natural hazards, but few have simultaneously addressed loading and parameter uncertainties within structural systems while accounting for prediction uncertainty of neural networks. To address these gaps, three metamodeling frameworks were formulated, each coupling a feature-extraction module implemented through a multi-layer perceptron (MLP), a message-passing neural network (MPNN), or an autoencoder (AE) with a long short-term memory (LSTM) network using Monte Carlo dropout and a negative log-likelihood loss. The resulting architectures (MLP-LSTM, MPNN-LSTM, and AE-LSTM) were validated on two case studies: a multi-degree-of-freedom Bouc-Wen system and a 37-story fiber-discretized nonlinear steel moment-resisting frame, both subjected to stochastic seismic excitation and structural parameter uncertainty. All three approaches achieved low prediction errors: the MLP-LSTM yielded the most accurate results for the lower-dimensional Bouc-Wen system, whereas the MPNN-LSTM and AE-LSTM provided superior performance on the more complex steel-frame model. Moreover, a consistent correlation between predictive variance and actual error confirms the suitability of these frameworks for active-learning strategies and for assessing model confidence in structural response predictions.