CLMar 13

LMEB: Long-horizon Memory Embedding Benchmark

arXiv:2603.1257245.35 citationsHas Code
Predicted impact top 4% in CL · last 90 daysOriginality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This addresses a gap in benchmarking for memory-augmented systems, providing a standardized framework to evaluate embedding models on complex, long-term memory tasks, though it is incremental as it focuses on evaluation rather than new methods.

The paper tackles the lack of evaluation for memory embeddings in handling long-horizon retrieval tasks by introducing the Long-horizon Memory Embedding Benchmark (LMEB), which spans 22 datasets and 193 tasks, and finds that larger models do not always perform better and performance in traditional retrieval does not generalize to memory retrieval.

Memory embeddings are crucial for memory-augmented systems, such as OpenClaw, but their evaluation is underexplored in current text embedding benchmarks, which narrowly focus on traditional passage retrieval and fail to assess models' ability to handle long-horizon memory retrieval tasks involving fragmented, context-dependent, and temporally distant information. To address this, we introduce the Long-horizon Memory Embedding Benchmark (LMEB), a comprehensive framework that evaluates embedding models' capabilities in handling complex, long-horizon memory retrieval tasks. LMEB spans 22 datasets and 193 zero-shot retrieval tasks across 4 memory types: episodic, dialogue, semantic, and procedural, with both AI-generated and human-annotated data. These memory types differ in terms of level of abstraction and temporal dependency, capturing distinct aspects of memory retrieval that reflect the diverse challenges of the real world. We evaluate 15 widely used embedding models, ranging from hundreds of millions to ten billion parameters. The results reveal that (1) LMEB provides a reasonable level of difficulty; (2) Larger models do not always perform better; (3) LMEB and MTEB exhibit orthogonality. This suggests that the field has yet to converge on a universal model capable of excelling across all memory retrieval tasks, and that performance in traditional passage retrieval may not generalize to long-horizon memory retrieval. In summary, by providing a standardized and reproducible evaluation framework, LMEB fills a crucial gap in memory embedding evaluation, driving further advancements in text embedding for handling long-term, context-dependent memory retrieval. LMEB is available at https://github.com/KaLM-Embedding/LMEB.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes