BROTHER: Behavioral Recognition Optimized Through Heterogeneous Ensemble Regularization for Ambivalence and Hesitancy
This work addresses a significant problem in affective computing for applications in behavioral analysis, though it appears incremental as it builds on existing multimodal and ensemble methods.
The paper tackled the challenge of recognizing complex behavioral states like Ambivalence and Hesitancy in naturalistic video by proposing a highly regularized, multimodal fusion pipeline, achieving a peak Macro F1-score of 0.7465 on an unseen test set.
Recognizing complex behavioral states such as Ambivalence and Hesitancy (A/H) in naturalistic video settings remains a significant challenge in affective computing. Unlike basic facial expressions, A/H manifests as subtle, multimodal conflicts that require deep contextual and temporal understanding. In this paper, we propose a highly regularized, multimodal fusion pipeline to predict A/H at the video level. We extract robust unimodal features from visual, acoustic, and linguistic data, introducing a specialized statistical text modality explicitly designed to capture temporal speech variations and behavioral cues. To identify the most effective representations, we evaluate 15 distinct modality combinations across a committee of machine learning classifiers (MLP, Random Forest, and GBDT), selecting the most well-calibrated models based on validation Binary Cross-Entropy (BCE) loss. Furthermore, to optimally fuse these heterogeneous models without overfitting to the training distribution, we implement a Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) hard-voting ensemble. The PSO fitness function dynamically incorporates a train-validation gap penalty (lambda) to actively suppress redundant or overfitted classifiers. Our comprehensive evaluation demonstrates that while linguistic features serve as the strongest independent predictor of A/H, our heavily regularized PSO ensemble (lambda = 0.2) effectively harnesses multimodal synergies, achieving a peak Macro F1-score of 0.7465 on the unseen test set. These results emphasize that treating ambivalence and hesitancy as a multimodal conflict, evaluated through an intelligently weighted committee, provides a robust framework for in-the-wild behavioral analysis.