CLAILGMar 15

$PA^3$: $\textbf{P}$olicy-$\textbf{A}$ware $\textbf{A}$gent $\textbf{A}$lignment through Chain-of-Thought

arXiv:2603.1460255.62 citationsh-index: 6
AI Analysis

This addresses the challenge of adhering to business-specific rules for conversational AI systems, offering an incremental improvement in efficiency and performance.

The paper tackles the problem of conversational assistants struggling with complex business rules by proposing a multi-stage alignment method that teaches models to recall and apply relevant policies during reasoning, resulting in a 16-point improvement over the baseline and 3 points over comparable in-context baselines with 40% fewer words.

Conversational assistants powered by large language models (LLMs) excel at tool-use tasks but struggle with adhering to complex, business-specific rules. While models can reason over business rules provided in context, including all policies for every query introduces high latency and wastes compute. Furthermore, these lengthy prompts lead to long contexts, harming overall performance due to the "needle-in-the-haystack" problem. To address these challenges, we propose a multi-stage alignment method that teaches models to recall and apply relevant business policies during chain-of-thought reasoning at inference time, without including the full business policy in-context. Furthermore, we introduce a novel PolicyRecall reward based on the Jaccard score and a Hallucination Penalty for GRPO training. Altogether, our best model outperforms the baseline by 16 points and surpasses comparable in-context baselines of similar model size by 3 points, while using 40% fewer words.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes