From Attention to Dialogue: Does Audience Engagement Reinforce Constructive Cross-Party Communication?
This addresses the problem of understanding how social media affects political polarization for researchers and policymakers, showing an incremental but data-driven insight into elite-audience dynamics.
The study investigated whether audience engagement on social media influences elite behavior in cross-partisan interactions, finding that high engagement leads legislators to increase cross-party communication and adopt more constructive rhetorical strategies like causal reasoning and positive-emotion framing.
While existing works have emphasized how elites shape mass opinion, we ask whether the reverse also holds: do audience reactions on social media actively shape elite behavior? We examine this question through the lens of cross-partisan interactions (CPIs), which can either foster deliberation or deepen polarization. Using a dataset of over 1.1 million cross-party retweets, replies, and mentions between U.S. state legislators and their audiences on Twitter/X (2020-2021), we first establish baseline patterns of engagement: Democrats gain modest engagement in replies and mentions, while Republicans often face penalties in direct cross-party interactions. Building on this, we show that audience engagement produces a feedback loop that conditions future elite behavior. Following highly visible CPIs, legislators are not only more likely to engage again in cross-talk, but also shift their rhetorical strategies. Engagement consistently promotes causal reasoning, subjective language, and positive-emotion framing in subsequent CPIs. These findings suggest a positive association between audience engagement and constructive cross-party discourse among elites, challenging overly simplified interpretations in the literature that emphasize social media as a primary driver of rising or falling polarization.