DSCCMar 23

A Dividing Line for Structural Kernelization of Component Order Connectivity via Distance to Bounded Pathwidth

arXiv:2603.2224049.7h-index: 1
AI Analysis

This work addresses kernelization complexity for structural parameters in graph algorithms, providing a precise threshold for COC, which is incremental relative to prior Vertex Cover results.

The paper tackles the Component Order Connectivity (COC) problem, a generalization of Vertex Cover, by establishing a dividing line for polynomial kernelization: it shows that COC admits a polynomial kernel when parameterized by distance to pathwidth-1 graphs plus d, complementing known impossibility results for distance to pathwidth-2 graphs.

In this work we study a classic generalization of the Vertex Cover (VC) problem, called the Component Order Connectivity (COC) problem. In COC, given an undirected graph $G$, integers $d \geq 1$ and $k$, the goal is to determine if there is a set of at most $k$ vertices whose deletion results in a graph where each connected component has at most $d$ vertices. When $d=1$, this is exactly VC. This work is inspired by polynomial kernelization results with respect to structural parameters for VC. On one hand, Jansen & Bodlaender [TOCS 2013] show that VC admits a polynomial kernel when the parameter is the distance to treewidth-$1$ graphs, on the other hand Cygan, Lokshtanov, Pilipczuk, Pilipczuk & Saurabh [TOCS 2014] showed that VC does not admit a polynomial kernel when the parameter is distance to treewidth-$2$ graphs. Greilhuber & Sharma [IPEC 2024] showed that, for any $d \geq 2$, $d$-COC cannot admit a polynomial kernel when the parameter is distance to a forest of pathwidth $2$. Here, $d$-COC is the same as COC only that $d$ is a fixed constant not part of the input. We complement this result and show that like for the VC problem where distance to treewidth-$1$ graphs versus distance to treewidth-$2$ graphs is the dividing line between structural parameterizations that allow and respectively disallow polynomial kernelization, for COC this dividing line happens between distance to pathwidth-$1$ graphs and distance to pathwidth-$2$ graphs. The main technical result of this work is that COC admits a polynomial kernel parameterized by distance to pathwidth-$1$ graphs plus $d$.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes