JanusBM: A Dual-Fidelity Multi-Zone White-Box Building Modeling Framework
This work addresses the need for accurate and efficient building energy models for sector-coupled energy systems, offering a hybrid approach that balances detail and speed, though it is incremental in combining existing modeling techniques.
The paper tackles the challenge of building energy modeling by proposing JanusBM, a dual-fidelity framework that combines high-fidelity and low-fidelity models, achieving high consistency with benchmarks and orders-of-magnitude faster simulations for annual analyses.
Accurate building energy models are crucial for analyzing sector-coupled energy systems, where buildings interact with electrified heating, energy storage, and advanced control across various scenarios. High-fidelity (HiFi) white-box models that resolve hydronic distribution and emitter dynamics can capture short-term transients, yet their numerical stiffness and computational burden limit long-term simulations and large-scale scenario exploration. Conversely, reduced-order low-fidelity (LoFi) representations enable rapid annual assessments but may fail to capture the hydronic- and control-induced dynamics that govern transient and peak behavior. This paper proposes a dual-fidelity, multi-zone white-box building modeling framework, which is called JanusBM, built on a novel topology-driven modeling tool RoomFlex6D, coupling a HiFi hydronic model and a LoFi ideal-load surrogate that removes explicit hydronic states in Modelica. To ensure applicability and physical consistency across time scales, we introduce a two-stage hybrid validation and calibration pipeline that uses complementary data: the IEA EBC Annex 60 benchmark for energy-scale validation and time-series measurements from real-world experimental buildings for hydronic dynamics-scale calibration. Results show that the generated LoFi models achieve a high degree of consistency with Annex 60 benchmark on the energy scale, and the proposed calibration workflow robustly improves loop-level return water temperature transients and zone-level temperature dynamics. Moreover, the LoFi model achieves orders-of-magnitude faster simulations suited to annual energy analyses, whereas the HiFi model becomes necessary when the required heat differs from the actual delivered heat due to distribution and control limitations, especially in transient and peak-oriented assessments.