LGMar 24

Estimating Flow Velocity and Vehicle Angle-of-Attack from Non-invasive Piezoelectric Structural Measurements Using Deep Learning

arXiv:2603.2349629.8h-index: 9
Predicted impact top 82% in LG · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This provides a non-intrusive method for aerodynamic state estimation in aerospace applications, but it is incremental as it builds on existing deep learning techniques for sensor data inversion.

The paper tackled the problem of estimating flow velocity and vehicle angle-of-attack non-invasively using structural vibration measurements, achieving a mean velocity error below 2.27 m/s (0.21%) and a mean AoA error of 0.44° (8.25%) on test data in a hypersonic wind tunnel.

Accurate estimation of aerodynamic state variables such as freestream velocity and angle of attack (AoA) is important for aerodynamic load prediction, flight control, and model validation. This work presents a non-intrusive method for estimating vehicle velocity and AoA from structural vibration measurements rather than direct flow instrumentation such as pitot tubes. A dense array of piezoelectric sensors mounted on the interior skin of an aeroshell capture vibrations induced by turbulent boundary layer pressure fluctuations, and a convolutional neural network (CNN) is trained to invert these structural responses to recover velocity and AoA. Proof-of-concept is demonstrated through controlled experiments in Sandia's hypersonic wind tunnel spanning zero and nonzero AoA configurations, Mach~5 and Mach~8 conditions, and both constant and continuously varying tunnel operations. The CNN is trained and evaluated using data from 16 wind tunnel runs, with a temporally centered held-out interval within each run used to form training, validation, and test datasets and assess intra-run temporal generalization. Raw CNN predictions exhibit increased variance during continuously varying conditions; a short-window moving-median post-processing step suppresses this variance and improves robustness. After post-processing, the method achieves a mean velocity error relative to the low-pass filtered reference velocity below 2.27~m/s (0.21\%) and a mean AoA error of $0.44^{\circ} (8.25\%)$ on held-out test data from the same experimental campaign, demonstrating feasibility of vibration-based velocity and AoA estimation in a controlled laboratory environment.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes