CLMar 25

Sparse Growing Transformer: Training-Time Sparse Depth Allocation via Progressive Attention Looping

arXiv:2603.2399889.32 citationsh-index: 15
Predicted impact top 32% in CL · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses the problem of inefficient training in Transformers for AI researchers, offering an incremental improvement over existing parameter reuse methods.

The paper tackles the computational redundancy in training Transformers by proposing a dynamic depth allocation method that progressively extends recurrence from deeper to shallower layers via targeted attention looping, reducing additional training FLOPs overhead from 16-20% to 1-3% while outperforming static baselines.

Existing approaches to increasing the effective depth of Transformers predominantly rely on parameter reuse, extending computation through recursive execution. Under this paradigm, the network structure remains static along the training timeline, and additional computational depth is uniformly assigned to entire blocks at the parameter level. This rigidity across training time and parameter space leads to substantial computational redundancy during training. In contrast, we argue that depth allocation during training should not be a static preset, but rather a progressively growing structural process. Our systematic analysis reveals a deep-to-shallow maturation trajectory across layers, where high-entropy attention heads play a crucial role in semantic integration. Motivated by this observation, we introduce the Sparse Growing Transformer (SGT). SGT is a training-time sparse depth allocation framework that progressively extends recurrence from deeper to shallower layers via targeted attention looping on informative heads. This mechanism induces structural sparsity by selectively increasing depth only for a small subset of parameters as training evolves. Extensive experiments across multiple parameter scales demonstrate that SGT consistently outperforms training-time static block-level looping baselines under comparable settings, while reducing the additional training FLOPs overhead from approximately 16--20% to only 1--3% relative to a standard Transformer backbone.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes