Sustainability Is Not Linear: Quantifying Performance, Energy, and Privacy Trade-offs in On-Device Intelligence
This addresses practical deployment challenges for on-device AI on mobile devices, though it is incremental in quantifying existing trade-offs rather than proposing new solutions.
The study quantified trade-offs between performance, energy, and privacy for on-device LLMs, finding that quantization yields negligible energy savings compared to mixed-precision methods and that MoE architectures offer storage capacity of 7B models with energy profiles of 1B-2B models, identifying Qwen2.5-3B as a sweet spot for balancing quality and energy.
The migration of Large Language Models (LLMs) from cloud clusters to edge devices promises enhanced privacy and offline accessibility, but this transition encounters a harsh reality: the physical constraints of mobile batteries, thermal limits, and, most importantly, memory constraints. To navigate this landscape, we constructed a reproducible experimental pipeline to profile the complex interplay between energy consumption, latency, and quality. Unlike theoretical studies, we captured granular power metrics across eight models ranging from 0.5B to 9B parameters without requiring root access, ensuring our findings reflect realistic user conditions. We harness this pipeline to conduct an empirical case study on a flagship Android device, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, establishing foundational hypotheses regarding the trade-offs between generation quality, performance, and resource consumption. Our investigation uncovered a counter-intuitive quantization-energy paradox. While modern importance-aware quantization successfully reduces memory footprints to fit larger models into RAM, we found it yields negligible energy savings compared to standard mixed-precision methods. This proves that for battery life, the architecture of the model, not its quantization scheme, is the decisive factor. We further identified that Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures defy the standard size-energy trend, offering the storage capacity of a 7B model while maintaining the lower energy profile of a 1B to 2B model. Finally, an analysis of these multi-objective trade-offs reveals a pragmatic sweet spot of mid-sized models, such as Qwen2.5-3B, that effectively balance response quality with sustainable energy consumption.