CLMar 31

Calibrated Confidence Expression for Radiology Report Generation

arXiv:2603.2949281.1h-index: 13
Predicted impact top 66% in CL · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses the need for safer AI deployment in radiology by enabling selective verification of reports, though it is incremental as it builds on existing methods for confidence calibration in a specific domain.

The paper tackled the problem of overconfidence in large vision-language models for radiology report generation by introducing ConRad, a reinforcement learning framework that produces calibrated verbalized confidence estimates, which improved calibration and aligned well with clinicians' judgment in evaluations.

Safe deployment of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) in radiology report generation requires not only accurate predictions but also clinically interpretable indicators of when outputs should be thoroughly reviewed, enabling selective radiologist verification and reducing the risk of hallucinated findings influencing clinical decisions. One intuitive approach to this is verbalized confidence, where the model explicitly states its certainty. However, current state-of-the-art language models are often overconfident, and research on calibration in multimodal settings such as radiology report generation is limited. To address this gap, we introduce ConRad (Confidence Calibration for Radiology Reports), a reinforcement learning framework for fine-tuning medical LVLMs to produce calibrated verbalized confidence estimates alongside radiology reports. We study two settings: a single report-level confidence score and a sentence-level variant assigning a confidence to each claim. Both are trained using the GRPO algorithm with reward functions based on the logarithmic scoring rule, which incentivizes truthful self-assessment by penalizing miscalibration and guarantees optimal calibration under reward maximization. Experimentally, ConRad substantially improves calibration and outperforms competing methods. In a clinical evaluation we show that ConRad's report level scores are well aligned with clinicians' judgment. By highlighting full reports or low-confidence statements for targeted review, ConRad can support safer clinical integration of AI-assistance for report generation.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes