LGCLMar 31

Tracking Equivalent Mechanistic Interpretations Across Neural Networks

arXiv:2603.3000264.8
AI Analysis

This work addresses foundational issues in mechanistic interpretability for AI researchers, offering a more rigorous evaluation framework, though it is incremental in building on existing MI concepts.

The paper tackles the challenges of scaling and generalizing mechanistic interpretability by defining and studying interpretive equivalence, which determines if two models share a common interpretation without requiring explicit descriptions, and develops an algorithm with guarantees relating interpretations, circuits, and representations, applied to Transformer-based models.

Mechanistic interpretability (MI) is an emerging framework for interpreting neural networks. Given a task and model, MI aims to discover a succinct algorithmic process, an interpretation, that explains the model's decision process on that task. However, MI is difficult to scale and generalize. This stems in part from two key challenges: there is no precise notion of a valid interpretation; and, generating interpretations is often an ad hoc process. In this paper, we address these challenges by defining and studying the problem of interpretive equivalence: determining whether two different models share a common interpretation, without requiring an explicit description of what that interpretation is. At the core of our approach, we propose and formalize the principle that two interpretations of a model are equivalent if all of their possible implementations are also equivalent. We develop an algorithm to estimate interpretive equivalence and case study its use on Transformer-based models. To analyze our algorithm, we introduce necessary and sufficient conditions for interpretive equivalence based on models' representation similarity. We provide guarantees that simultaneously relate a model's algorithmic interpretations, circuits, and representations. Our framework lays a foundation for the development of more rigorous evaluation methods of MI and automated, generalizable interpretation discovery methods.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes