GaelEval: Benchmarking LLM Performance for Scottish Gaelic
This addresses the need for better evaluation of LLMs on morphosyntactically rich minority languages, though it is incremental as it focuses on benchmarking rather than model development.
The researchers tackled the problem of uneven and under-measured performance of multilingual LLMs on minority languages like Scottish Gaelic by introducing GaelEval, the first multi-dimensional benchmark for Gaelic, and found that Gemini 3 Pro Preview achieved 83.3% accuracy on a linguistic task, surpassing the human baseline of 78.1%.
Multilingual large language models (LLMs) often exhibit emergent 'shadow' capabilities in languages without official support, yet their performance on these languages remains uneven and under-measured. This is particularly acute for morphosyntactically rich minority languages such as Scottish Gaelic, where translation benchmarks fail to capture structural competence. We introduce GaelEval, the first multi-dimensional benchmark for Gaelic, comprising: (i) an expert-authored morphosyntactic MCQA task; (ii) a culturally grounded translation benchmark and (iii) a large-scale cultural knowledge Q&A task. Evaluating 19 LLMs against a fluent-speaker human baseline ($n=30$), we find that Gemini 3 Pro Preview achieves $83.3\%$ accuracy on the linguistic task, surpassing the human baseline ($78.1\%$). Proprietary models consistently outperform open-weight systems, and in-language (Gaelic) prompting yields a small but stable advantage (+$2.4\%$). On the cultural task, leading models exceed $90\%$ accuracy, though most systems perform worse under Gaelic prompting and absolute scores are inflated relative to the manual benchmark. Overall, GaelEval reveals that frontier models achieve above-human performance on several dimensions of Gaelic grammar, demonstrates the effect of Gaelic prompting and shows a consistent performance gap favouring proprietary over open-weight models.