Saliency-R1: Enforcing Interpretable and Faithful Vision-language Reasoning via Saliency-map Alignment Reward
This addresses trustworthiness issues in VLMs for users in vision-language applications, but it is incremental as it builds on existing methods with a novel saliency technique.
The authors tackled the problem of vision-language models (VLMs) relying too much on text and producing ungrounded responses by proposing Saliency-R1, a framework that improves reasoning faithfulness and interpretability, leading to enhanced overall task performance.
Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable success across diverse tasks. However, concerns about their trustworthiness persist, particularly regarding tendencies to lean more on textual cues than visual evidence and the risk of producing ungrounded or fabricated responses. To address these issues, we propose Saliency-R1, a framework for improving the interpretability and faithfulness of VLMs reasoning. Specifically, we introduce a novel saliency map technique that efficiently highlights critical image regions contributing to generated tokens without additional computational overhead. This can further be extended to trace how visual information flows through the reasoning process to the final answers, revealing the alignment between the thinking process and the visual context. We use the overlap between the saliency maps and human-annotated bounding boxes as the reward function, and apply Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to align the salient parts and critical regions, encouraging models to focus on relevant areas when conduct reasoning. Experiments show Saliency-R1 improves reasoning faithfulness, interpretability, and overall task performance.