CRAIMAApr 5

The Art of Building Verifiers for Computer Use Agents

Tsinghua
arXiv:2604.0624094.01 citationsh-index: 19Has Code
AI Analysis

This addresses the critical challenge of reliable verification for computer use agents, enabling trustworthy evaluation and training, though it appears incremental as it builds on existing verification methods with specific design improvements.

The paper tackles the problem of verifying computer use agent trajectories by introducing the Universal Verifier, which reduces false positive rates to near zero compared to baselines like WebVoyager (≥45%) and WebJudge (≥22%), and achieves human-level agreement on a new benchmark.

Verifying the success of computer use agent (CUA) trajectories is a critical challenge: without reliable verification, neither evaluation nor training signal can be trusted. In this paper, we present lessons learned from building a best-in-class verifier for web tasks we call the Universal Verifier. We design the Universal Verifier around four key principles: 1) constructing rubrics with meaningful, non-overlapping criteria to reduce noise; 2) separating process and outcome rewards that yield complementary signals, capturing cases where an agent follows the right steps but gets blocked or succeeds through an unexpected path; 3) distinguishing between controllable and uncontrollable failures scored via a cascading-error-free strategy for finer-grained failure understanding; and 4) a divide-and-conquer context management scheme that attends to all screenshots in a trajectory, improving reliability on longer task horizons. We validate these findings on CUAVerifierBench, a new set of CUA trajectories with both process and outcome human labels, showing that our Universal Verifier agrees with humans as often as humans agree with each other. We report a reduction in false positive rates to near zero compared to baselines like WebVoyager ($\geq$ 45\%) and WebJudge ($\geq$ 22\%). We emphasize that these gains stem from the cumulative effect of the design choices above. We also find that an auto-research agent achieves 70\% of expert quality in 5\% of the time, but fails to discover all strategies required to replicate the Universal Verifier. We open-source our Universal Verifier system along with CUAVerifierBench; available at https://github.com/microsoft/fara.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes