Grid2Matrix: Revealing Digital Agnosia in Vision-Language Models
Identifies a fundamental limitation in VLMs' ability to exhaustively read visual details, which is critical for tasks like tables, charts, and GUIs.
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) fail to faithfully capture fine visual details, as shown by a new benchmark (Grid2Matrix) where models must map a color grid to a matrix. VLMs exhibit sharp early collapse on small grids, and this failure persists despite model scaling and alignment, revealing a gap between visual encoding and language output termed 'Digital Agnosia'.
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel on many multimodal reasoning benchmarks, but these evaluations often do not require an exhaustive readout of the image and can therefore obscure failures in faithfully capturing all visual details. We introduce Grid2Matrix (G2M), a controlled benchmark in which a model is shown a color grid and a color-to-number mapping, and must output the corresponding matrix. By varying grid size and the number of colors, G2M provides a simple way to increase visual complexity while minimizing semantic confounds. We find that VLMs exhibit a sharp early collapse in zero-shot end-to-end evaluation, failing on surprisingly small grids rather than degrading gradually as the task becomes denser. We probe the visual encoders of VLMs from two representative families and find that they preserve substantially more of the grid information than the corresponding end-to-end outputs. This suggests that the failure is not explained by visual encoding alone, but also reflects a gap between what remains recoverable from visual features and what is ultimately expressed in language. We term this gap \textit{Digital Agnosia}. Further analyses show that these errors are highly structured and depend strongly on how grid cells overlap with visual patch boundaries. We also find that common strategies such as model scaling and multimodal alignment do not fully eliminate this failure mode. We expect G2M to serve as a useful testbed for understanding where and how VLMs lose fine visual details, and for evaluating tasks where missing even small visual details can matter, such as tables, charts, forms, and GUIs.