LGApr 12

CARE-ECG: Causal Agent-based Reasoning for Explainable and Counterfactual ECG Interpretation

arXiv:2604.1042069.31 citationsh-index: 23
Predicted impact top 26% in LG · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

For clinicians using LLM-based ECG interpretation, this framework enhances grounding and counterfactual reasoning, addressing a key limitation of existing systems.

CARE-ECG introduces a causally structured ECG-language reasoning framework that improves diagnostic accuracy and explanation faithfulness while reducing hallucinations, achieving 0.84 accuracy on Expert-ECG-QA and 0.76 on SCP-mapped PTB-XL under GPT-4.

Large language models (LLMs) enable waveform-to-text ECG interpretation and interactive clinical questioning, yet most ECG-LLM systems still rely on weak signal-text alignment and retrieval without explicit physiological or causal structure. This limits grounding, temporal reasoning, and counterfactual "what-if" analysis central to clinical decision-making. We propose CARE-ECG, a causally structured ECG-language reasoning framework that unifies representation learning, diagnosis, and explanation in a single pipeline. CARE-ECG encodes multi-lead ECGs into temporally organized latent biomarkers, performs causal graph inference for probabilistic diagnosis, and supports counterfactual assessment via structural causal models. To improve faithfulness, CARE-ECG grounds language outputs through causal retrieval-augmented generation and a modular agentic pipeline that integrates history, diagnosis, and response with verification. Across multiple ECG benchmarks and expert QA settings, CARE-ECG improves diagnostic accuracy and explanation faithfulness while reducing hallucinations (e.g., 0.84 accuracy on Expert-ECG-QA and 0.76 on SCP-mapped PTB-XL under GPT-4). Overall, CARE-ECG provides traceable reasoning by exposing key latent drivers, causal evidence paths, and how alternative physiological states would change outcomes.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes