Unveiling contrasting impacts of heat mitigation and adaptation policies on U.S. internal migration
For policymakers, this reveals that heat mitigation and adaptation policies have opposing effects on internal migration, which is crucial for understanding population dynamics under climate change.
This study analyzes the impact of 4,713 heat-related policies on 11,177 migration flows between U.S. counties, finding that adaptation policies reduce out-migration while mitigation policies increase it, with effects varying by policy type and moderated by socioeconomic factors.
While climate-induced population migration has received rising attention, the role played by human climate endeavors remains underexplored. Here, we combine machine learning with attribution mapping to analyze the impacts of 4,713 heat-related policies (HPs) on 11,177 migration flows between U.S. counties. We find that heat adaptation policies (APs) and heat mitigation policies (MPs) have significant and opposing impacts on internal migration: APs reduce out-migration, while MPs increase it. These policies have heterogeneous effects on migration among policy types. Behavioral and cultural MPs at origins lead to a 0.24%-0.68% (95% confidence interval) increase in annual outflows per policy, whereas behavioral and cultural APs at destinations elevate outflows of origins by 0.11%-1.55% (95% confidence interval). Migration patterns are nonlinearly moderated by income, ageing, education, and racial diversity of both origin and destination counties. Ageing rates have the most noticeable U-shaped relationship in shaping migration responses to behavioral and cultural MPs at origins, and inverted U-shapes for institutional MPs at origins and nature-based MPs at destinations. These findings offer critical insights for policymakers on how HPs influence migration as global warming and policy interventions persist.