AICLCVApr 13

Back to the Barn with LLAMAs: Evolving Pretrained LLM Backbones in Finetuning Vision Language Models

arXiv:2604.1098534.9h-index: 10
Predicted impact top 12% in AI · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

For VLM developers, this study reveals that LLM backbone upgrades yield task-dependent benefits, with some capabilities emerging only in the newest generation while visual understanding tasks see little gain.

This paper investigates how upgrading the LLM backbone in VLMs affects downstream task performance, finding that newer backbones do not always improve results; for instance, in VQA tasks, newer LLMs solve different questions rather than more, driven by better calibrated confidence and stable representations.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have rapidly advanced by leveraging powerful pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) as core reasoning backbones. As new and more capable LLMs emerge with improved reasoning, instruction-following, and generalization, there is a pressing need to efficiently update existing VLMs to incorporate these advancements. However, the integration of new LLMs into VLMs, particularly how the evolving LLMs contribute to multimodal reasoning, alignment, and task-specific performance remains underexplored. Addressing this gap is important for VLM development, given the rapid evolution of pretrained LLM backbones. This study presents a controlled and systematic investigation of how changes in the pretrained LLM backbone affect downstream VLM task performance. By having the vision encoder, training data, and post-training algorithm remain same across LLAMA-1, LLAMA-2, and LLAMA-3 based VLMs, we find that newer LLM backbones do not always lead to better VLMs, but the performance depends on the downstream VLM task. For example, in visual question and answering tasks, newer LLM backbones tend to solve different questions rather than just more questions, and our analysis shows this is driven by differences in how the models process information, including better calibrated confidence and more stable internal representations. We also find that some VLM capabilities appear only in the newest LLM generation, while tasks that depend mainly on visual understanding see little benefit from a newer LLM backbone.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes