CVLGApr 14

Don't Show Pixels, Show Cues: Unlocking Visual Tool Reasoning in Language Models via Perception Programs

arXiv:2604.1289686.2h-index: 8
Predicted impact top 20% in CV · last 90 daysOriginality Highly original
AI Analysis

For researchers and practitioners using MLLMs with vision tools, P^2 provides a training-free method to unlock tool reasoning by fixing the representation bottleneck.

Multimodal language models (MLLMs) often fail to benefit from vision tools because raw pixel-level outputs are misaligned with language-native reasoning. Perception Programs (P^2) rewrites tool outputs into compact, structured summaries, achieving 22% average accuracy gain across BLINK tasks and setting new SOTA (e.g., GPT-5 Mini from 41.35% to 86.47% on multi-view reasoning) without training.

Multimodal language models (MLLMs) are increasingly paired with vision tools (e.g., depth, flow, correspondence) to enhance visual reasoning. However, despite access to these tool-generated visual cues, MLLMs often fail to benefit from them. Existing approaches typically feed raw tool outputs into the model, but these dense, pixel-level representations are misaligned with the language-native reasoning strengths of LLMs, leading to weak perception and reliance on language priors. We argue that, in problems where vision tools can provide the necessary visual cues, the bottleneck is not more tool calls or larger MLLMs, it is how tool outputs are represented. We introduce Perception Programs (P$^2$), a training-free, model-agnostic method that rewrites tool outputs into compact, structured, language-native summaries that MLLMs can directly parse and reason over. Across six perception-centric tasks in BLINK, P$^2$ consistently yields large improvements over base models and raw tool-augmented baselines. With GPT-5 Mini as the base model, P$^2$ raises its accuracy from 41.35\% to 86.47\% on multi-view reasoning, from 52.42\% to 81.45\% on relative depth, and achieves a 22\% average gain across tasks, setting new state-of-the-art results. Even on smaller MLLMs, e.g., InternVL3.5-4B and Qwen3VL-4B, we observe 15-40\% absolute gains from P$^2$, surpassing prior agentic, supervised, and RL-based tool-use methods-without any training or model modifications.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes