Evaluating Encodings for Bivariate Edges in Adjacency Matrices
For visualization researchers and practitioners, this provides empirical guidance on encoding multivariate edge data in adjacency matrices, filling a gap in empirical evaluation.
This paper presents the first empirical evaluation of four encodings for bivariate edges in adjacency matrices. In a crowdsourced study with 156 participants, area-based overlaid marks and bar charts achieved the highest performance, while bivariate color consistently underperformed.
We present the first empirical evaluation of techniques for encoding distributions of quantitative edge values within adjacency matrices. In many real-world networks, edges represent not a single value but a set of measurements. While adjacency matrices preserve structural clarity, their compact cells limit the simultaneous display of multiple values. To address this, we explore edge encodings that represent distributions by two values: a measure of central tendency (mean, median, mode) and a measure of dispersion (standard deviation, variance, IQR). We select four possible encodings for evaluation that prior work has suggested are suitable for the limited space available in matrices: a bivariate color palette, embedded bar charts, and two overlaid-mark designs mapping the primary attribute to color and the secondary attribute to area or angle. In a preregistered crowdsourced study with 156 participants, we assessed performance of these encodings across eight analytical tasks and collected readability and aesthetic ratings. Results reveal clear performance regimes: area-based overlaid marks and bar charts achieved the highest overall performance; angle-based marks show moderate but less stable performance,and bivariate color consistently underperforms these alternatives. These findings clarify how visual channels behave under strict constraints and delineate the strengths and limitations of key design choices for multivariate edge visualization.