Benchmarking Classical Coverage Path Planning Heuristics on Irregular Hexagonal Grids for Maritime Coverage Scenarios
Provides a reproducible benchmark for evaluating heuristics on sparse geometric graphs, highlighting the importance of underreported implementation details for maritime coverage planning.
This paper benchmarks 17 classical coverage path planning heuristics on 10,000 irregular hexagonal grid instances for maritime scenarios, finding that a Warnsdorff variant with terminal-inclusive residual-degree achieves 79.0% Hamiltonian success, and that implementation details like residual-degree definition significantly impact performance.
Coverage path planning on irregular hexagonal grids is relevant to maritime surveillance, search and rescue and environmental monitoring, yet classical methods are often compared on small ad hoc examples or on rectangular grids. This paper presents a reproducible benchmark of deterministic single-vehicle coverage path planning heuristics on irregular hexagonal graphs derived from synthetic but maritime-motivated areas of interest. The benchmark contains 10,000 Hamiltonian-feasible instances spanning compact, elongated, and irregular morphologies, 17 heuristics from seven families, and a common evaluation protocol covering Hamiltonian success, complete-coverage success, revisits, path length, heading changes, and CPU latency. Across the released dataset, heuristics with explicit shortest-path reconnection solve the relaxed coverage task reliably but almost never produce zero-revisit tours. Exact Depth-First Search confirms that every released instance is Hamiltonian-feasible. The strongest classical Hamiltonian baseline is a Warnsdorff variant that uses an index-based tie-break together with a terminal-inclusive residual-degree policy, reaching 79.0% Hamiltonian success. The dominant design choice is not tie-breaking alone, but how the residual degree is defined when the endpoint is reserved until the final move. This shows that underreported implementation details can materially affect performance on sparse geometric graphs with bottlenecks. The benchmark is intended as a controlled testbed for heuristic analysis rather than as a claim of operational optimality at fleet scale.