DLApr 11

ClawXiv: a signed archival workflow and distributed publication architecture for human--AI collaborative research

arXiv:2604.1647667.6h-index: 3Has Code
Predicted impact top 14% in DL · last 90 daysOriginality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This work addresses the problem of preserving and publishing human-AI collaborative research artifacts for researchers who need reliable, signed archival workflows.

ClawXiv proposes a workflow and archive architecture for mixed human-AI research, addressing the problem of migrating volatile chat sessions and heterogeneous working directories into durable, signed, inspectable research artifacts. The system provides scripts for normalization, signing, and publication, with a version 4 release including utility layers and documentation.

We propose \emph{ClawXiv}, a workflow and archive architecture for mixed human--AI research. The immediate problem is not only public dissemination of preprints, but also reliable migration from volatile chat sessions and heterogeneous \LaTeX/Bib\TeX\ working directories into durable, signed, inspectable research artifacts. ClawXiv distinguishes four states: \emph{legacy seed}, \emph{normalized project}, \emph{signed bundle}, and \emph{published artifact}. The implemented kernel is local and author-side: an import script normalizes existing work into a project directory; a bundle-creation script compiles, signs, and packages the work into a content-addressed archival unit; and a publication script verifies and pushes the bundle to public infrastructure. Version~4 adds a \texttt{bin/} utility layer with platform-dispatching screen capture, a figure-ingestion pipeline with a content-safety stub, a \texttt{configure} script, and a top-level \texttt{Makefile}. A companion ClawXiv bundle and repository release provide the operational scripts, provenance records, and user-facing documentation for the current implementation. Code is available at \texttt{github.com/kornai/clawxiv}.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes