SDApr 17

Coexisting Tempo Traditions in Beethoven's Piano and Cello Sonatas: A K-means Clustering Analysis of Recorded Performances, 1930-2012

arXiv:2604.1665810.72 citationsh-index: 6
AI Analysis

For empirical performance studies, this work reframes stylistic change as coexisting traditions rather than a single evolving trend, with implications for interpreting corpus-level tempo data.

This paper challenges the conventional unidirectional model of tempo change in recorded performances by applying k-means clustering to Beethoven's piano and cello sonatas, revealing at least two to three stable tempo traditions per movement that coexist across eight decades, with negligible internal drift. The findings show that tempo traditions reflect individual interpretive choice rather than collective cultural inheritance.

Empirical studies of recorded performance have conventionally modelled tempo change as a unidirectional historical process, fitting linear regression lines to tempo data plotted against recording year. This paper argues that such approaches impose a false narrative of uniform stylistic evolution on what is, in fact, a plurality of coexisting interpretive traditions. Applying k-means clustering (k=3) to bar-level BPM data from over one hundred recordings of Beethoven's five piano and cello sonatas (Op. 5 Nos. 1 and 2; Op. 69; Op. 102 Nos. 1 and 2) spanning 1930-2012, this study reveals that every movement supports at least two, and usually three, discrete tempo traditions (slow, mid-range, and fast), whose internal regression slopes are negligible (R-squared <= 0.25 in all but one case), demonstrating that each tradition is independently stable across eight decades. The mid-range cluster dominates in all movements, typically comprising 55-70% of recordings. A slow cluster is absent from fast-character movements (Op. 5 Rondos, Op. 69 Scherzo), reflecting a shared rhetorical consensus about their character. The single case of significant intra-cluster drift (Op. 102 No. 1 Allegro con brio, R-squared=0.246, p=0.013) indicates a moderate mid-range deceleration of approximately 3.2 BPM across the study period. No correlation is found between cluster membership and performers' generational, national, or pedagogical backgrounds, suggesting that tempo tradition reflects individual interpretive choice rather than collective cultural inheritance. The paper proposes an ecological model of stylistic change - coexisting traditions shifting in relative prevalence rather than a single tradition evolving - and argues that this reframing has broad implications for how empirical performance studies interpret corpus-level tempo data.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes