Toward Clinically Acceptable Chest X-ray Report Generation: A Qualitative Retrospective Pilot Study of CXRMate-2
For radiologists and clinical AI developers, this work demonstrates that CXR report generation models can approach radiologist-level acceptability, though recall improvements are still needed.
CXRMate-2 achieves state-of-the-art chest X-ray report generation, with gains of 11.2% in GREEN and 24.4% in RadGraph-XL over MedGemma 1.5 on MIMIC-CXR. In a blinded radiologist evaluation, generated reports were deemed acceptable in 45% of ratings, with no significant difference in preference for 7 of 8 findings, suggesting a pathway to clinical acceptability.
Chest X-ray (CXR) radiology report generation (RRG) models have shown rapid progress, yet their clinical utility remains uncertain due to limited evaluation by radiologists. We present CXRMate-2, a state-of-the-art CXR RRG model that integrates structured multimodal conditioning and reinforcement learning with a composite reward for semantic alignment with radiologist reports. Across the MIMIC-CXR, CheXpert Plus, and ReXgradient datasets, CXRMate-2 achieves statistically significant improvements over strong benchmarks, including gains of 11.2% and 24.4% in GREEN and RadGraph-XL, respectively, on MIMIC-CXR relative to MedGemma 1.5 (4B). To directly compare CXRMate-2 against radiologist reporting, we conduct a blinded, randomised qualitative retrospective evaluation. Three consultant radiologists compare generated and radiologist reports across 120 studies from the MIMIC-CXR test set. Generated reports were deemed acceptable (defined as preferred or rated equally to radiologist reports) in 45% of ratings, with no statistically significant difference in preference rates between radiologist reports and acceptable generated reports for seven of the eight analysed findings. Preference for radiologist reports was driven primarily by higher recall, while generated reports were often preferred for readability. Together, these results suggest a credible pathway to clinically acceptable CXR RRG. Improvements in recall, alongside better detection of subtle findings (e.g., pulmonary congestion), are likely sufficient to achieve non-inferiority to radiologist reporting. With these targeted advances, CXR RRG systems may be ready for prospective evaluation in assistive roles within radiologist-led workflows.