Odor Maps from the LLM-derived similarity scores
This work addresses the challenge of automating odor analysis for researchers in sensory science and AI, but it is incremental as it extends existing methods to new data.
The study tackled the problem of evaluating whether large language models (LLMs) can infer odor similarity by comparing LLM-derived similarity scores with human sensory data, finding that LLMs can infer odor similarity to some degree and generating an odor map where essential oils within the same group are closely located, suggesting alignment with human evaluation.
The application of large language models (LLMs) to OdorSpace analysis attracts growing interest. Recent studies have explored the comparison of sensory evaluation spaces derived from LLMs with odor character profiles in the Dravnieks' dataset. In this study, we calculated pairwise distances of odor descriptors using three distance measures and statistically compared these LLM-derived similarities with distances derived from the original data. Next, we extended this approach to odor names (ingredients). Statistical comparison revealed that LLMs can infer odor similarity to some degree, suggesting the potential of odor maps generated from these similarity data. Applying this approach, we generated an odor map of essential oils. It demonstrates that essential oils within the same group are closely located in the odor map, suggesting that the proximity in the odor map corresponds to human evaluation.