LGApr 26

Can an MLP Absorb Its Own Skip Connection?

arXiv:2604.2370517.2
AI Analysis

This work clarifies the fundamental representational difference between residual and non-residual MLPs for practitioners designing deep architectures.

The paper investigates whether a skip connection around a single-hidden-layer MLP can be absorbed into a residual-free MLP of the same width. It finds that for most activation functions (e.g., ReLU^2, SwiGLU, GELU) absorption is impossible or non-generic, implying that skip-connected and residual-free MLPs represent generically disjoint function classes.

We study when a skip connection around a single-hidden-layer MLP can be absorbed into a residual-free MLP of the same width. We first show that for any architecture whose skip branch is an invertible linear map (including Hyper-Connections and their manifold-constrained variants), the problem reduces to the identity skip case. For homogeneous activations of degree $k \neq 1$, such as ReLU$^2$ and ReGLU, absorption is unconditionally impossible by a degree argument. For gated activations whose gate is differentiable at the origin with $g(0) = 0$, including SwiGLU and GeGLU, a linearization argument gives the same conclusion. These impossibility results extend to arbitrary depth: a composition of $L$ residual blocks using such activations cannot be replicated by any composition of $L$ residual-free blocks of the same width. For ungated ReLU and GELU, the situation is richer. For generic weight matrices, absorption holds at the single-block level if and only if there exists an index set $S$ of size at least $d$ such that $W_{\mathrm{down}}[:,S]\,W_{\mathrm{up}}[S,:] = -I_d$. This condition is non-generic (it fails with probability one under continuous weight distributions), so skip-connected and residual-free MLPs of the same width represent generically disjoint function classes. Whether this disjointness persists for deep compositions of ReLU or GELU blocks remains open.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes