Characterizing the Usefulness of Code Review Comments in Scientific Software for Software Quality and Scientific Rigor
For developers and researchers in the scientific software community, this study provides empirical insights into code review comment usefulness, though findings are largely confirmatory of existing knowledge.
This paper characterizes the usefulness of code review comments in scientific open-source software (Sci-OSS), finding that 6-33% of comments are not useful and that prior findings from general-purpose software largely apply, with some nuances like mixed correlations for positive emoji reactions.
Context: Innovation thrives on scientific software, with useful code review feedback enhancing its correctness and impact. However, unlike general-purpose commercial and open-source software, the usefulness of code review feedback (CR comment) in scientific software remains largely unstudied. Objective: This paper aims to characterize the usefulness of CR comment in scientific opens ource software (Sci-OSS), leveraging existing research on useful CR comment. Method: To achieve this objective, we mine successful Sci-OSS from GitHub, analyze their CR comments with usefulness related features, and compare the findings from prior research on general-purpose commercial and open-source CR comments. Results: The investigation on the usefulness of CR comments in SciOSS confirms many characteristics that prior research identified in general-purpose software. For example, subjective or negative CR comments remain not useful for the Sci-OSS. We also find CR comments which receive negative emoji reactions have a very small correlation with not useful comments, whereas the positive emojis show mixed correlations. Importantly, 6-33% CR comments in Sci-OSS are not useful in our mined repositories. Conclusions: Our investigation into Sci-OSS extends findings from CR comments' usefulness research on general-purpose software, benefiting developers, scientists, and researchers in the Sci-OSS community.