MedSynapse-V: Bridging Visual Perception and Clinical Intuition via Latent Memory Evolution
For medical AI practitioners, this work improves diagnostic accuracy of VLMs by bridging visual perception and clinical intuition, though it is an incremental improvement over existing methods.
MedSynapse-V addresses the cognitive misalignment in medical VLMs caused by discrete tokenization, proposing a framework for latent diagnostic memory evolution that simulates clinicians' experiential invocation. The method significantly outperforms existing SOTA methods, including chain-of-thought paradigms, in diagnostic accuracy across multiple datasets.
High-precision medical diagnosis relies not only on static imaging features but also on the implicit diagnostic memory experts instantly invoke during image interpretation. We pinpoint a fundamental cognitive misalignment in medical VLMs caused by discrete tokenization, leading to quantization loss, long-range information dissipation, and missing case-adaptive expertise. To bridge this gap, we propose ours, a framework for latent diagnostic memory evolution that simulates the experiential invocation of clinicians by dynamically synthesizing implicit diagnostic memories within the model's hidden stream. Specifically, it begins with a Meta Query for Prior Memorization mechanism, where learnable probes retrieve structured priors from an anatomical prior encoder to generate condensed implicit memories. To ensure clinical fidelity, we introduce Causal Counterfactual Refinement (CCR), which leverages reinforcement learning and counterfactual rewards derived from region-level feature masking to quantify the causal contribution of each memory, thereby pruning redundancies and aligning latent representations with diagnostic logic. This evolutionary process culminates in Intrinsic Memory Transition (IMT), a privileged-autonomous dual-branch paradigm that internalizes teacher-branch diagnostic patterns into the student-branch via full-vocabulary divergence alignment. Comprehensive empirical evaluations across multiple datasets demonstrate that ours, by transferring external expertise into endogenous parameters, significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods, particularly chain-of-thought paradigms, in diagnostic accuracy.