OCGTSYSYApr 30

Moral Hazard in LTI Dynamics: A Hypothesis Testing Approach

arXiv:2605.0015868.1
AI Analysis

For control system designers, this provides a principled method to incentivize agents to choose cost-minimizing controllers under moral hazard, addressing a gap in incentive design for control systems.

This paper designs an optimal payment scheme to mitigate moral hazard in LTI control systems, where an agent chooses between two state-feedback controllers with different control costs. The optimal payment is determined by a likelihood ratio hypothesis test, demonstrated on load frequency control and wellness intervention examples.

Many incentive design problems must contend with information asymmetries due to non-observation of efficiency (adverse selection) or non-observation of effort (moral hazard). And although a growing body of literature considers incentive design in control systems, the problem of designing incentives for control systems under information asymmetries has been less well-studied. This paper considers a model of moral hazard within control systems. In our model, the control system is described by an (affine) linear time-invariant (LTI) system with process noise. There is an agent who gets to choose (from between two choices) a linear state-feedback controller to apply to the LTI system, with one of the state-feedback controllers having a higher quadratic cost on the control inputs than the other. Our goal is to design a payment scheme that incentivizes the agent to choose the state-feedback controller that minimizes a quadratic cost on system states plus the time-discounted payment amount, subject to the understanding that the agent bears the control cost while being risk-averse with respect to their time-discounted payment. We formulate the problem as a constrained optimization, and prove that for a payment given after a fixed (but optimizable) time horizon the optimal payment scheme chooses the payment amount using a likelihood ratio hypothesis test. We numerically demonstrate our results by applying the derived optimal payment scheme to two examples: load frequency control (LFC) in power systems and wellness interventions for body weight loss.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes