Impact of Task Phrasing on Presumptions in Large Language Models
For developers and users of LLMs, this work highlights the importance of careful task phrasing to mitigate presumptions and improve reliability.
The study investigates how task phrasing induces presumptions in LLMs, using the iterated prisoner's dilemma as a case study. Results show that LLMs are susceptible to presumptions even with reasoning steps, but neutral phrasing reduces this effect.
Concerns with the safety and reliability of applying large-language models (LLMs) in unpredictable real-world applications motivate this study, which examines how task phrasing can lead to presumptions in LLMs, making it difficult for them to adapt when the task deviates from these assumptions. We investigated the impact of these presumptions on the performance of LLMs using the iterated prisoner's dilemma as a case study. Our experiments reveal that LLMs are susceptible to presumptions when making decisions even with reasoning steps. However, when the task phrasing was neutral, the models demonstrated logical reasoning without much presumptions. These findings highlight the importance of proper task phrasing to reduce the risk of presumptions in LLMs.