Optimal Hardness of Online Algorithms for Large Common Induced Subgraphs

arXiv:2605.0389330.3
Predicted impact top 47% in DS · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

For researchers in combinatorial optimization and online algorithms, this work provides tight hardness results for online algorithms on a fundamental graph problem, revealing a gap between online and offline performance.

The paper studies the problem of finding large common induced subgraphs in two independent Erdős–Rényi random graphs. It shows that a simple greedy online algorithm achieves a common induced subgraph of size (2-o(1)) log₂ n, and proves that no online algorithm can achieve size (2+ε) log₂ n, establishing a computation-to-optimization gap.

We study the problem of efficiently finding large common induced subgraphs of two independent Erdős--Rényi random graphs $G_1, G_2 \sim \mathbb{G}(n,1/2)$. Recently, Chatterjee and Diaconis showed that the largest common induced subgraph of $G_1$ and $G_2$ has size $(4-o(1))\log_2 n$ with high probability. We first show that a simple greedy online algorithm finds a common induced subgraph of $G_1$ and $G_2$ of size $(2-o(1)) \log_2 n$ with high probability. Our main result shows that no online algorithm can find a common induced subgraph of $G_1$ and $G_2$ of size at least $(2+\varepsilon) \log_2 n$ with probability bounded away from $0$ as $n \to \infty$. Together, these results provide evidence that this problem exhibits a computation-to-optimization gap. To prove the impossibility result, we show that the solution space of the problem exhibits a version of the (multi) overlap gap property (OGP), and utilize an interpolation argument recently developed by Gamarnik, Kizildağ, and Warnke that connects OGP and online algorithms.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes