Maximal Controlled Invariant-MPC: Enhancing Feasibility and Reducing Conservatism through Terminal CBF Constraint in Safety-Critical Control

arXiv:2605.055757.9h-index: 2
Predicted impact top 82% in SY · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

For safety-critical control systems, this method enhances feasibility and optimality by reducing conservatism in CBF-based constraints.

This paper proposes an MPC formulation using a CBF as a terminal constraint to improve feasibility and reduce conservatism in safety-critical control. The approach reduces infeasible points by a factor of 1.7 to 2.7 and expands the reachable state space.

Optimal control for safety-critical systems is often dependent on the conservativeness of constraints. Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) serve as a medium to represent such constraints, but constructing a minimally conservative CBF is a computationally intractable problem. Therefore, approaches that can guarantee safety while reducing conservatism will help improve the optimality of the system under consideration. Here, we present a Model Predictive Control (MPC) formulation using CBF as a terminal constraint, which is proven to improve feasibility and reachable sets with increasing prediction horizon. The constructive nature of the proofs allows for warm-starting the nonlinear optimization problem, thereby reducing the computational time substantially. Simulations are set up for a simple nonholonomic system to numerically validate the results, and it is observed that the number of infeasible points decreased by a factor of 1.7 to 2.7. The increase in reachable state space was demonstrated by the ability of the system to track trajectories that are entirely inside the unsafe region of the control barrier function.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes