LGMay 10

First Worst-Case Regret Bounds for Combinatorial Thompson Sampling in Sleeping Semi-Bandits

arXiv:2605.0927733.0Has Code
AI Analysis

It resolves long-standing theoretical gaps in combinatorial Thompson sampling for semi-bandits with sleeping arms, offering both theoretical guarantees and practical improvements for applications like wireless mesh routing.

The paper provides the first worst-case regret bounds for combinatorial Thompson sampling in sleeping semi-bandits, proving tight upper and lower bounds, and introduces CL-SG, a variant that achieves improved regret and outperforms baselines in experiments.

We revisit combinatorial Thompson sampling (CTS) for semi-bandits with sleeping arms, where arm availability varies over time and actions must satisfy combinatorial constraints, as in wireless mesh routing with fluctuating link availability. Despite its practical relevance, CTS has been hindered by several long-standing problems: (i) the absence of worst-case regret guarantees in the semi-bandit setting even without sleeping arms, (ii) the lack of theory under adversarially varying availability, and (iii) the consistently weak empirical performance of CTS with Gaussian priors (CTS-G). This paper resolves these long-standing issues by providing the first worst-case regret analysis of CTS-G, proving an upper bound of $\tilde{O}(m\sqrt{NT})$ and a matching lower bound of $\tildeΩ(m\sqrt{NT})$. To bridge the gap between theory and practice, we further propose CL-SG, a simple CTS-G variant that samples a single shared Gaussian seed each round to coordinate exploration across arms. We show that CL-SG achieves an improved regret bound of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{mNT})$, together with a matching lower bound $Ω(\sqrt{mNT})$. Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that CL-SG consistently outperforms strong baselines including CTS-G and CTS-B, and we open-source our implementation for reproducibility.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes