TSNBench: Benchmarking LLM Proficiency in Time-Sensitive Networking
For researchers and practitioners in safety-critical networking, this benchmark exposes a critical gap in LLM reliability for real-time computation tasks, showing that current models are insufficient for practical deployment.
TSNBench, the first benchmark for evaluating LLMs in Time-Sensitive Networking, reveals that while models achieve 67-95% accuracy on multiple-choice questions, they fail substantially on open-ended worst-case delay computation tasks, with best MAPE of 36.2% for CBS and 41.8% for CQF, indicating that MCQ benchmarks may overestimate LLM capabilities in safety-critical domains.
We present TSNBench, the first benchmark for evaluating large language model (LLM) proficiency in Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN), a suite of IEEE 802.1 standards for deterministic communication with bounded latency in safety-critical domains such as autonomous vehicles, aviation, defense, and industrial automation. While LLMs have been extensively evaluated on general knowledge tasks, their capabilities in safety-critical networking domains remain largely unexplored. TSNBench comprises 939 expert-validated multiple-choice questions (MCQs) covering diverse TSN mechanisms, along with 100 open-ended Worst-Case Delay (WCD) computation tasks for Credit-Based Shaper (CBS) and Cyclic Queuing and Forwarding (CQF) across varying network topologies and traffic conditions. MCQ answers are validated by domain experts, and open-ended ground truth WCD values are computed using a verified Network Calculus (NC) solver for CBS and closed-form mathematical upper bounds for CQF. We evaluate 16 LLMs and find that although models achieve 67 to 95% accuracy on MCQs, they fail substantially on open-ended WCD computation. For CBS, only GPT-5 achieves a Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of 36.2%, meaning its predicted WCD deviates by 36.2% of the actual TSN flow delay on average, while most models exceed 80%. For CQF, the best model achieves 41.8% MAPE, with most models clustering between 80% and 100%. Such errors are large relative to TSN latency budgets and can lead to violations of real-time constraints and unsafe configurations. TSNBench demonstrates that MCQ benchmarks may overestimate LLM capabilities in safety-critical networking domains.