AIMay 12

Persistent and Conversational Multi-Method Explainability for Trustworthy Financial AI

arXiv:2605.1168715.9
Predicted impact top 51% in AI · last 90 daysOriginality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

For financial institutions requiring trustworthy AI, this work provides a practical system for persistent and conversational explanations, though it is an incremental engineering contribution.

The paper presents an architecture for persistent, multi-method explainability in financial sentiment analysis, enabling conversational access and cross-validation of explanations. Constrained prompting reduces hallucination rate by 36% and increases method-attribution citations by 73% compared to naive prompting.

Financial institutions increasingly require AI explanations that are persistent, cross-validated across methods, and conversationally accessible to human decision-makers. We present an architecture for human-centered explainable AI in financial sentiment analysis that combines three contributions. First, we treat XAI artifacts -- LIME feature attributions, occlusion-based word importance scores, and saliency heatmaps -- as persistent, searchable objects in distributed S3-compatible storage with structured metadata and natural-language summaries, enabling semantic retrieval over explanation history and automatic index reconstruction after system failures. Second, we enable multi-method explanation triangulation, where a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) assistant compares and synthesizes results from multiple XAI methods applied to the same prediction, allowing users to assess explanation robustness through natural-language dialogue. Third, we evaluate the faithfulness of generated explanations using automated checks over grounding completeness, hallucinated claims, and method-attribution behavior. We demonstrate the architecture on an EXTRA-BRAIN financial sentiment analysis pipeline using FinBERT predictions and present evaluation results showing that constrained prompting reduces hallucination rate by 36\% and increases method-attribution citations by 73\% compared to naive prompting. We discuss implications for trustworthy, human-centered AI services in regulated financial environments.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes